This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The effect of twin-to-twin delivery time intervals on neonatal outcome for second twins
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 17 March 2017
Accepted: 14 January 2018
Published: 19 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eran Barzilay|
|24 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe DERUELLE|
|11 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Linnéa Lindroos|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eran Barzilay|
|27 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Linnéa Lindroos|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Linnéa Lindroos|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12884-018-1668-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.