Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Infant feeding practices within a large electronic medical record database

  • Emily Bartsch1Email author,
  • Alison L. Park2,
  • Jacqueline Young2,
  • Joel G. Ray3 and
  • Karen Tu4
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1633-9

Received: 30 January 2017

Accepted: 15 December 2017

Published: 2 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emily Victoria Bartsch
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheila Gephart
18 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Gale
28 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emily Victoria Bartsch
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheila Gephart
7 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Wood
5 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emily Victoria Bartsch
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emily Victoria Bartsch
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emily Victoria Bartsch
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1633-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(2)
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
(3)
Departments of Medicine, Health Policy Management and Evaluation, and Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(4)
Department of Family and Community Medicine, and Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto Western Hospital Family Health Team, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Advertisement