Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Sacks
19 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Sacks
8 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Bailey
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kent T. HayGlass
23 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Sacks
11 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Bailey
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kent T. HayGlass
27 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Bailey
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Bailey
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement