Table 3 Hierarchical Logistic Regression analysis of women’s individual attributes and their social network variables predicting facility delivery (N = 274)
Variables | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | |
|---|---|---|
Model I | Model II | |
Age of respondents | .92(.82–1.14) | .94(.86–1.03) |
Educational level | ||
No education® | 1 | 1 |
Primary (1–8) | .95(.29–3.12) | .54(.25–1.19) |
High school and above | 3.79 (2.31–23.04)* | 8.07(1.36–17.64)* |
Husband’s educational status | ||
Illiterate® | 1 | 1 |
Literate | 2.20(.62–5.05) | 1.70((.84–3.43) |
Residence | ||
Rural® | 1 | 1 |
Urban | 2.75(.86–8.77) | 3.32(1.37–8.05)** |
Parity | ||
1–2 children® | 1 | 1 |
3–4 children | .22(.04–1.09) | .85(.38–1.92) |
> = 5 children | 1.91(.08–4.36) | 2.35(.57–9.73) |
Use of ANC | ||
No® | 1 | 1 |
Yes | 4.33(.85–2.13) | 1.86(.83–4.17) |
Knowledge of obstetric complications | ||
Limited ® | 1 | 1 |
Better knowledge | 2.31(.70–7.63) | 3.01(1.46–6.18)** |
Household autonomy | .63(.21–1.92) | 1.47(.61–3.52) |
Network size | – | 1.29(1.16–1.45)*** |
Network tie strength | ||
Weak® | 1 | |
Strong | – | .73(.35–1.55) |
Network homogeneity | ||
Less homogeneous ® | 1 | |
Homogeneous | – | 2.53(1.26–5.06)** |
SBA endorsement | ||
Low ® | 1 | |
High | – | 7.97(4.07–12.16)*** |
Network neighborhood | ||
Non-neighbor® | 1 | |
Neighbor | – | 1.65(.85–3.36) |
Model G2 (−2log likelihood) | 313.836 | 245.685 |
Degree of freedom | 10 | 15 |
Changed Chi-square | 95.731*** | 134.116*** |