This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Efficacy and safety of pertussis vaccination for pregnant women – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 August 2016
Accepted: 3 November 2017
Published: 22 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elke Leuridan|
|5 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Calvert|
|6 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Marie Furuta|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Calvert|
|21 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Marie Furuta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1559-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.