This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
What is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm cephalic/non-cephalic twin pairs? A systematic review and meta-analyses
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 29 June 2017
Accepted: 31 October 2017
Published: 29 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zilma Reis|
|20 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Easterling|
|19 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Dagenais|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1554-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.