This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Examining the provisional guidelines for weight gain in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
- Olha Lutsiv†1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Adam Hulman†1,
- Christy Woolcott2,
- Joseph Beyene3,
- Lucy Giglia4,
- B. Anthony Armson5,
- Linda Dodds2,
- Binod Neupane3 and
- Sarah D. McDonald6
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 May 2016
Accepted: 21 September 2017
Published: 29 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Bodnar|
|17 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Olha Lutsiv|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Bodnar|
|29 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Olha Lutsiv|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Bodnar|
|14 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Olha Lutsiv|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1530-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.