This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 11 April 2016
Accepted: 18 September 2017
Published: 22 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Levine|
|15 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anjali Joann Kaimal|
|7 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tanya Nippita|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tanya Nippita|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1518-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.