This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 July 2016
Accepted: 18 September 2017
Published: 25 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maralyn Foureur|
|19 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yves Jacquemyn|
|26 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Patey|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yves Jacquemyn|
|14 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Patey|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|25 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.