Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework

  • Andrea M. Patey1, 2Email author,
  • Janet A. Curran3,
  • Ann E. Sprague4,
  • Jill J. Francis2,
  • S. Michelle Driedger5,
  • France Légaré6, 7,
  • Louise Lemyre8,
  • Marie-Pascale A. Pomey9,
  • Jeremy M. Grimshaw1, 10 and
  • for the Canada Prime Plus team
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:320

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z

Received: 1 July 2016

Accepted: 18 September 2017

Published: 25 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maralyn Foureur
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yves Jacquemyn
26 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Patey
Resubmission - Version 2
26 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yves Jacquemyn
14 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Patey
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute – General Campus
(2)
School of Health Sciences, City, University of London
(3)
School of Nursing, Dalhousie University
(4)
Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario
(5)
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba
(6)
Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval
(7)
Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec
(8)
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa
(9)
University of Montreal
(10)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa

Advertisement