Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A survey-based study of Zika virus communication preferences among pregnant women in Georgia, United States

  • Mallory K. Ellingson1Email author,
  • Catherine M. Bonk2 and
  • Allison T. Chamberlain1
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:325

Received: 24 April 2017

Accepted: 18 September 2017

Published: 26 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
24 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Israel Romero Molina
9 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicole Widmar
18 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mallory Ellingson
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1516-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
Atlanta Gynecology & Obstetrics, Decatur, USA