Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study

  • Darie O. A. Daemers1Email author,
  • Evelien B. M. van Limbeek1,
  • Hennie A. A. Wijnen1,
  • Marianne J. Nieuwenhuijze1 and
  • Raymond G. de Vries1, 2
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:345

Received: 13 February 2017

Accepted: 15 September 2017

Published: 6 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
13 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul de Reu
3 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Paternotte
15 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Darie Daemers
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul de Reu
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1511-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands