Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Grand multiparity and the possible risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a dilemma to be deciphered

  • Ghadeer K. Al-Shaikh1,
  • Gehan H. Ibrahim2Email author,
  • Amel A. Fayed3, 4 and
  • Hazem Al-Mandeel1
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:310

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1508-0

Received: 27 May 2016

Accepted: 14 September 2017

Published: 19 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Hoffman
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Fleming
18 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gehan Ibrahim
Resubmission - Version 2
18 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
14 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1508-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
(2)
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
(3)
College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
(4)
Department of Biostatistics, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Advertisement