Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of Perceived Clinical Utility of NIPT with IPD by Demographic Characteristics

From: Obstetric professionals’ perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications

  

Total (n = 327)

High school (n = 70)

University (n = 257)

χ2

Obstetrician (n = 90)

Midwife (n = 237)

χ2

Public Sector (n = 136)

Private Sector (n = 191)

χ2

Safer testing for the fetus

Y

89%

77%

93%

14.2**

96%

87%

4.94

93%

86%

4.89

N

4%

6%

4%

 

1%

5%

 

2%

6%

 

DK

7%

17%

3%

 

3%

8%

 

5%

8%

 

Less physiological stress for high-risk women

Y

79%

69%

82%

13.6**

78%

80%

2.47

77%

81%

1.41

N

12%

10%

12%

 

16%

10%

 

14%

10%

 

DK

9%

21%

6%

 

6%

10%

 

9%

9%

 

Further psychological assurance for low-risk women

Y

69%

64%

71%

3.33

68%

70%

12.8**

61%

75%

7.89*

N

20%

19%

20%

 

29%

16%

 

26%

15%

 

DK

11%

17%

9%

 

3%

14%

 

13%

10%

 

Earlier detection of chromosome abnormality

Y

63%

59%

65%

8.03*

47%

70%

41.6***

60%

66%

1.46

N

23%

17%

25%

 

48%

14%

 

25%

22%

 

DK

14%

24%

10%

 

5%

16%

 

15%

12%

 

Earlier consideration of termination of pregnancy

Y

50%

49%

50%

7.78*

39%

54%

25.8***

40%

57%

8.28*

N

33%

24%

36%

 

54%

26%

 

40%

29%

 

DK

17%

27%

14%

 

7%

20%

 

20%

14%

 

Less maternal stress in case of termination of pregnancy

Y

41%

46%

39%

10.7**

32%

44%

27.9***

32%

47%

8.03*

N

41%

26%

45%

 

62%

33%

 

48%

36%

 

DK

18%

28%

16%

 

6%

23%

 

20%

17%

 

Easier comprehension of test result

Y

39%

49%

36%

21.6***

18%

46%

65.0***

30%

45%

11.6**

N

41%

19%

47%

 

77%

28%

 

52%

34%

 

DK

20%

32%

17%

 

5%

26%

 

18%

21%

 
  1. Y = Yes, N = No, DK = Don’t Know
  2. *p < .05; ** p < .01, *** p < .001