This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Obstetric professionals’ perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications
- Olivia Miu Yung Ngan†1, 2,
- Huso Yi†1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Samuel Yeung Shan Wong1,
- Daljit Sahota3 and
- Shenaz Ahmed4
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 January 2017
Accepted: 28 August 2017
Published: 5 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geralyn M L Messerlian|
|18 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helga Gottfredsdottir|
|22 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Olivia Miu Yung Ngan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Olivia Miu Yung Ngan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Olivia Miu Yung Ngan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1474-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.