Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided primarily by midwives in Japan

From: Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method

No. Indicator

Rating result

Median

Agreement (%)b

1. Primipara who has enrolled in a childbirth class about antenatal care and delivery by 36 weeks gestation

adopted

8

8 (72.7%)

2. Discussed a birth plana

added and adopted

9

11 (100%)

3. Initial assessment of labor risk at admission

adopted

7

10 (90.9%)

4. Assessment during first stage labor

adopted

8

8 (72.7%)

5. Assessment during second stage labor

adopted

9

10 (90.9%)

6. Women with a term, singleton infant in vertex position delivered by Cesarean section

adopted

8

10 (90.9%)

7. Women with a term, singleton infant in vertex position delivered by Vaginal delivery

adopted

9

11 (100%)

8. Women with a term, singleton infant in vertex position delivered by Instrument delivery

adopted

9

11 (100%)

9. Women with a term, singleton infant in vertex position delivered by labor inductiona

modified and adopted

8

9 (81.8%)

10. Term infant with Apgar score less than 7 at five minutes after birth

adopted

9

9 (81.8%)

11. Living infant with birth injuries

adopted

7

9 (81.8%)

12. Respiratory support: Resuscitation for asphyxiated term neonate with low oxygen concentrations and oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry immediately after birtha

added and adopted

8

10 (90.9%)

13. Women with perineal tear and no episiotomy

adopted

9

11 (100%)

14. Second degree perineal lacerationa

added and adopted

8

9 (81.8%)

15. Third or fourth degree perineal laceration

adopted

8

11 (100%)

16. Postpartum hemorrhage more than 500 g within 2 h of birth

adopted

8

10 (90.9%)

17. Infant admission to pediatrics department within a week after birth (excludes those with congenital anomalies)

adopted

8

9 (81.8%)

18. Infants that were fed only breast milk at the time of discharge from the hospital

adopted

8

11 (100%)

19. Peer review of severe adverse events with medical staff

adopted

8

9 (81.8%)

20. Woman switched to receive care provided primarily by obstetricians from midwifery ward

adopted

8

11 (100%)

21. Mother received cessation counseling intervention (including guidance on smoking cessation) if identified as either a tobacco user or passive smoker

adopted

7

6 (54.5%)

22. Infant administered vitamin K three times by one month after birth

adopted

9

11 (100%)

23. Infants who had been fed only breast milk at the time of the health examination for children of 1 month of agea

added and adopted

9

11 (100%)

24. Women with second degree perineal laceration, not due to instrument delivery

not adopted

1

4 (36.4%)

25. Women that unintentionally retained foreign objects during labor and delivery

not adopted

5

4 (36.4%)

26. Neonatal bloodstream infections within 48 h of birth

not adopted

5

2 (18.2%)

27. Medication error made in non-recommended abbreviations, symbols or dose designations used in medical prescriptions

not adopted

1

0 (0%)

28. Women with complex social factors who were offered additional support and information on public resources

not adopted

2

1 (9.1%)

29. Women that received antenatal or postnatal guidance regarding body weight and physical activity

not adopted

6

5 (45.4%)

  1. These indicators denote the frequency with which care was provided and recorded for women admitted to an in-hospital midwifery ward
  2. aThese indicators were advanced in Step 4 and rated in Step 5
  3. bAgreement (%) indicates the proportion of members who gave ratings of 7–9 points to adopt a candidate quality indicator