Open Peer Review Reports for: Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wouter Bakker |
| 22 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tom Witteveen |
| 23 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen J Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Apr 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wouter Bakker |
| 11 May 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen J Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 May 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Jun 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen J Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Jun 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 31 Jul 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen J Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 31 Jul 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Aug 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Aug 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-017-1461-y |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
