Skip to main content

Table 4 Knowledge on risks and benefits of both modes of delivery amongst one previous caesarean delivery women attending KNH ANC

From: Trial of labour or elective repeat caesarean delivery:are women making an informed decision at Kenyatta national hospital?

Parameters

N (%)

Women’s knowledge on risks associated with repeat C/S than TOLAC (n = 163)

 Increased blood loss

124 (28.4%)

 High risk of infection

106 (24.3%)

 Complication of anaesthesia

36 (8.3%)

 Uterine scar rupture in case of big baby

10 (2.3%)

 Injury to organs

5 (1.1%)

 Recovery is longer

140 (32.2%)

 Limb numbness

15 (3.4%)

Women’s knowledge on risks associated with TOLAC than ERCD (n = 155)

 Uterine scar rupture resulting in emergency C/S

54 (20.8%)

 Failed trial of labour

114 (44%)

 Uterine rupture is > with VBAC than repeat C/S

81 (31.3%)

 Increased blood loss

5 (1.9%)

 Increased risk of infection

2 (0.8%)

 Foetal death

3 (1.2%)

Women’s knowledge regarding overall chances of success of TOLAC

 Very high (>50%)

65 (32.2%)

 Very low (<25%)

40 (19.8%)

 Don’t know

97 (48%)

Women’s knowledge regarding the risks of uterine scar rupture

 Very low (<1%) but increased with number of c/s

64 (31.7%)

 Very high (>50%)

29 (14.4%)

 Don’t know

109 (53.9%)

Women’s knowledge on recovery from vaginal delivery against repeat C/S

 Same

1 (0.5%)

 Longer for repeat C/S

166 (82.2%)

 Longer for vaginal delivery

2 (1%)

 I don’t know

33 (16.3%)

Reasons for previous c/s as important factor in determining the chance of successful TOLAC according to the participants

 Yes

60 (29.7%)

 No

30 (14.9%)

 Don’t know

112 (55.4%)