This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 26 February 2016
Accepted: 27 July 2017
Published: 2 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Feb 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Hauck|
|8 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Davis|
|8 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Inge Boesveld|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Hauck|
|24 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Davis|
|8 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Inge Boesveld|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1439-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.