Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of exposure-disease associations within Raine Study subsets and the Raine Pregnancy Cohort at birth. Data presented as relative odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals

From: The Raine study had no evidence of significant perinatal selection bias after two decades of follow up: a longitudinal pregnancy cohort study

 

Raine Pregnancy Cohort at birth

Raine 5-year Subset

Raine 20-year Subset

Raine Growth Subset

Raine NAFLD Subset

Vacuum extraction vs. neonatal jaundice

Reference

0.92

0.89

0.58

0.57

(0.61, 1.22)

(0.29, 1.48)

(0.28, 0.87)

(0.22, 0.92)

Low birth weight vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery

0.95

0.84

1.11

0.93

(0.89, 1.02)

(0.82, 1.05)

(0.95, 1.27)

(0.80, 1.05)

Maternal age > 30y vs. elective caesarean section

1.09

1.53

1.02

1.33

(0.77, 1.42)

(0.64, 2.42)

(0.59, 1.48)

(0.59, 2.07)

Preterm birth vs. neonatal jaundice

1.63

1.96

2.15

1.72

(0.00, 3.55)

(0.00, 5.24)

(0.00, 5.87)

(0.00, 4.54)

Maternal smoking vs. low birth weight

1.00

1.06

1.00

1.14

(0.74, 1.25)

(0.60, 1.51)

(0.61, 1.40)

(0.60, 1.67)

Pre-eclampsia vs. preterm birth

0.87

1.08

0.93

0.96

(0.48, 1.25)

(0.71, 1.46)

(0.82, 1.05)

(0.73, 1.18)