This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The Raine study had no evidence of significant perinatal selection bias after two decades of follow up: a longitudinal pregnancy cohort study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 July 2015
Accepted: 21 June 2017
Published: 29 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fiona Mensah|
|31 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alice Rumbold|
|24 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Scott William White|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fiona Mensah|
|15 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alice Rumbold|
|18 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Scott William White|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Scott William White|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1391-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.