Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The Raine study had no evidence of significant perinatal selection bias after two decades of follow up: a longitudinal pregnancy cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Mensah
31 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alice Rumbold
24 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Scott William White
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Mensah
15 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alice Rumbold
18 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Scott William White
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Scott William White
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1391-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement