Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted odds Ratios for the association between the presence of a MWH and use a MWH

From: Personal and environmental factors associated with the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia

Variable

Mean (SD)/n(%)

Adjusted OR

95% CI

P-value

MWH

No MWH

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Intention

199 (98%)

124 (90.5%)

4.58

1.39

15.17

.013

Cognitive Attitude

198 (97.5%)

110 (80.3%)

8.63

3.13

23.79

<.001

Affective Attitude

79 (38.9%)

23 (16.9%)

4.20

2.33

7.57

<.001

Descriptive Norms

161 (79.3%)

119 (86.9%)

0.49

0.26

0.94

.03

Injunctive Norms

194 (95.6%)

68 (49.6%)

27.09

12.23

60.03

<.001

PBC

95 (46.8%)

56 (40.9%)

1.06

0.66

1.69

ns

Risk Perception

201 (99%)

122 (89.1%)

11.63

2.52

53.62

.002

Perceived Barriers

58 (28.6%)

88 (64.2%)

0.27

0.16

0.47

<.001

Complications during ANC

52 (25.6%)

28 (20.4%)

1.38

0.79

2.4

ns

Stay at the clinic

68 (33.5%)

32 (23.4%)

1.78

1.05

3.02

.03

Stay at the MWH

56 (27.6%)

23 (16.8%)

2.30

0.71

7.39

ns

Place of delivery

179 (88.2%)

92 (67.2%)

3.36

1.85

6.12

<.001

Birth attendant

177 (87.2%)

91 (66.4%)

3.24

1.80

5.84

<.001

Complications during labour

48 (23.6%)

22 (16.1%)

1.75

0.96

3.19

ns

  1. Odds Ratio adjusted for age, parity, marital status, level of income, and distance to the nearest health centre