Open Peer Review Reports for: What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marloes Dekker Nitert |
| 1 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Holly Priddis |
| 15 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Kirstie Coxon |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Kirstie Coxon |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 15 Mar 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
