Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The effectiveness of double incision technique in uterus preserving surgery for placenta percreta

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chet Wells
15 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karin Anneliese Fox
6 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Polat
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Polat
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Polat
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Polat
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Polat
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-017-1262-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement