The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Symon|
|6 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Soo Downe|
|19 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Kearney|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Soo Downe|
|18 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Symon|
|29 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Kearney|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-016-1216-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.