Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validity of gestational age estimates by last menstrual period and neonatal examination compared to ultrasound in Vietnam

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sue Lee
12 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryn Kemp
14 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Deputy
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Deputy
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryn Kemp
15 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Deputy
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Deputy
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Deputy
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1192-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement