Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Perceptions and experiences of using a nipple shield among parents and staff – an ethnographic study in neonatal units

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1183-6

Received: 30 September 2015

Accepted: 7 December 2016

Published: 3 January 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Wilhelm
30 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Eglash
8 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Renée Flacking
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Wilhelm
30 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Eglash
13 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Renée Flacking
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
3 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1183-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
(2)
Maternal and Infant Nutrition and Nurture Unit (MAINN), School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

Advertisement