Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: findings from literature review and cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Brodribb
6 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanne Kronborg
23 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Vishnu Khanal
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Brodribb
3 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Vishnu Khanal
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Vishnu Khanal
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Vishnu Khanal
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
5 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
12 Dec 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1180-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement