Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The usefulness of CYFRA 21–1 to diagnose and predict preeclampsia: a nested case-control study

  • Lorenz Kuessel1,
  • Harald Zeisler1Email author,
  • Robin Ristl2,
  • Julia Binder1, 3,
  • Petra Pateisky1,
  • Maximilian Schmid1,
  • Julian Marschalek1,
  • Thomas Perkmann4,
  • Helmuth Haslacher4 and
  • Heinrich Husslein1
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:339

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1132-4

Received: 2 July 2016

Accepted: 25 October 2016

Published: 3 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
25 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
3 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1132-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
(2)
Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
(3)
Fetal Medicine Unit, St George’s Hospital, London, UK
(4)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Advertisement