Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Bacterial vaginosis and adverse outcomes among full-term infants: a cohort study

  • Adam S. Dingens1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Tessa S. Fairfortune1,
  • Susan Reed1, 3, 4 and
  • Caroline Mitchell5, 6
Contributed equally
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:278

Received: 25 June 2016

Accepted: 6 September 2016

Published: 22 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
25 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1073-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, USA
University of Washington, Molecular & Cellular Biology Program, Seattle, USA
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, USA
Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA