Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Use of the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter-Coustan criteria for assessing gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome

  • Mei-Chun Lu1,
  • Song-Shan Huang2,
  • Yuan-Horng Yan1, 3, 4, 5 and
  • Panchalli Wang2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:231

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1030-9

Received: 14 January 2014

Accepted: 15 August 2016

Published: 17 August 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 12
Submitted Manuscript version 12
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 13
Submitted Manuscript version 13
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 14
Submitted Manuscript version 14
Resubmission - Version 15
Submitted Manuscript version 15
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 16
Submitted Manuscript version 16
Publishing
15 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1030-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Research, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
(4)
Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
(5)
Department of Nutrition and Institute of Biomedical Nutrition, Hung Kuang University, Taichung, Taiwan

Advertisement