Skip to main content

Table 1 Responses to continuous cycling (CONT) compared with interval cycling of equivalent duration (INTV) (mean ± SD)

From: Enhancing energy expenditure and enjoyment of exercise during pregnancy through the addition of brief higher intensity intervals to traditional continuous moderate intensity cycling

 

CONT

INT

n = 12

n = 12

Physiological measures during 20-min conditioning

 Mean power output (W)

78 ± 22

99 ± 18a

 Mean power output15 sec effort (W)

Not applicable

281 ± 72

 Mean heart rate (bpm)

126 ± 8

136 ± 1a

 Mean percentage HRmax

68 ± 4

73 ± 5a

\( \overset{.}{\mathrm{V}} \)O2 (L.min−1)

1.23 ± 0.24

1.57 ± 0.28a

 Est. energy expenditure (kJ)

506 ± 99

645 ± 116a

 Glucosepre (mmol∙L−1)

5.9 ± 1.0

5.6 ± 1.2

 Glucosepost (mmol∙L -1)

4.8 ± 0.8b

4.6 ± 0.9b

Psychological measures during 20-min conditioning

 Mean RPEoverall

11 ± 2

12 ± 1

 Mean RPE15s_effort

Not applicable

16 ± 1

 Exercise enjoyment (PACES score)

82 ± 21

101 ± 12a

  1. Footnotes: HR max percentage age-predicted heart rate maximum, PACES Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (higher score indicates greater enjoyment of exercise), RPE rate of perceived exertion from of 6 to 20 scale; 6 = no exertion, 20 = maximal exertion
  2. adenotes significant difference between conditions (P < 0.05)
  3. bdenotes significant difference pre/post within condition (P < 0 .05)