Skip to main content

Table 1 Prevalence and socio-demographic factors associated with vitamin B12 deficiency and marginal vitamin B12 deficiency in a representative sample of pregnant women in Colombia

From: Vitamin B12 concentrations in pregnant Colombian women: analysis of nationwide data 2010

Characteristics

Adequate B12 concentration

Marginal vitamin B12 deficiency

Vitamin B12 deficiency

 

n

%a, 95 % CIb

n

%a, 95 % CIb

n

%a, 95 % CIb

Total

697

40.1 (38.1–41.8)

737

41.3 (39.4–43.0)

347

18.6 (16.8–20.3)

Age (years)

13 to 17

101

42.2 (37.2–45.7)

94

39.4 (33.9–42.2)

50

18.4 (14.1–21.5)

18 to 29

435

39.6 (37.3–41.6)

489

42.3 (40.2–44.2)

218

18.1 (16.0–20.0)

30 to 49

161

40.3 (36.6–43.0)

154

39.5 (35.9–42.4)

79

20.2 (16.1–23.4)

Socioeconomic level

Level I

417

41.1 (38.7–43.1)

418

40.8 (38.4–42.9)

200

18.1 (15.8–20.0)

Level IIc

62

34.4 (28.3–38.5)

78

49.9 (44.6–53.5)

30

15.7 (10.5–19.3)

Level IIIc

48

48.6 (41.1–53.3)

51

33.0 (27.5–36.6)

25

18.4 (11.4–22.9)

Level IV or more

170

38.4 (35.1–41.0)

190

41.4 (38.4–43.9)

92

20.2 (16.9–22.9)

Geographic area

Atlantic (North)

190

47.0 (44.1–49.5)

179

42.6 (39.7–45.0)

67

10.4 (8.2–12.1)

Eastern

86

31.4 (28.1–33.9)

106

47.9 (43.1–51.4)

45

20.7 (16.2–24.0)

Central

164

50.3 (46.6–53.2)

131

32.5 (29.2–35.1)

65

17.2 (13.5–20.1)

Pacific (West)

49

19.8 (15.9–22.7)

108

46.8 (43.2–49.6)

73

33.4 (29.2–36.7)

Bogotác

46

45.9 (40.5–49.5)

39

39.1 (33.3–43.1)

15

15.0 (9.2–19.0)

National territories (South)

162

37.8 (34.1–40.6)

174

39.9 (36.4–42.7)

82

22.3 (17.6–26.0)

Urbanicity

Urban

441

40.7 (38.6–42.7)

481

41.0 (38.9–42.8)

224

18.3 (16.2–20.1)

Rural

256

38.0 (35.2–40.4)

256

42.4 (39.2–45.0)

123

19.6 (16.7–22.0)

Ethnic group

Indigenous

95

30.5 (24.9–34.2)

96

38.7 (31.7–43.3)

66

30.8 (23.8–35.4)

Black or Afro-Colombian

70

41.0 (35.8–44.8)

85

41.7 (37.6–44.7)

43

17.3 (13.0–20.5)

Others

530

40.5 (38.5–42.3)

554

41.4 (39.4–43.2)

234

18.1 (16.1–19.9)

  1. aAll women analysed by ethnic group were n = 1,773, another 8 appertained to “Raizal del archipiélago”, who were not analysed because this group do not have a representative sample
  2. bIt is not correct to calculate the percentages from the “n” presented in this table; these calculations were taken from weight from the values given to each subject
  3. cCoefficient of variation is more than 20 % deficiency prevalence therefore variation should be used with caution