Facility-based delivery in the context of Zimbabwe’s HIV epidemic – missed opportunities for improving engagement with care: a community-based serosurvey

Table 2 The association between maternal HIV status and uptake of facility-based delivery, Zimbabwe 2012

	Overall frequency		Uptake of facility-based delivery
	N	%	%	PR_u	95 % CI	PR_a	95 % CI^a
Self-reported HIV status				(p < 0.001)		(p < 0.001)
Not tested / unknown status before delivery	686	(7.8)	44.4	0.56	(0.49–0.64)	0.60	(0.54–0.68)
Self-reported HIV-negative before delivery	7067	(80.3)	79.3	1.00		1.00
Self-reportedHIV-positive before pregnancy	584	(6.6)	82.2	1.04	(0.99–1.09)	1.04	(1.00–1.09)
Self-reported HIV-positive during pregnancy	459	(5.2)	80.4	1.01	(0.97–1.06)	1.05	(1.01–1.09)

PR_u unadjusted prevalence ratio, PR_a adjusted prevalence ratio, CI confidence interval
^aRegression model of 8685 biological women, adjusted for the clustered study design. In addition to the variable listed in the table, the model includes province, urban vs. rural status, maternal age, education, religion, number of household assets, household-level food security status, lifetime births, marital status, sex of household head, decision maker of place of delivery

ISSN: 1471-2393