Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study

  • Gillian Frosst1,
  • Jennifer Hutcheon1, 2, 3,
  • KS Joseph2, 3,
  • Brooke Kinniburgh1,
  • Cathe Johnson1 and
  • Lily Lee1Email author
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201515:123

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7

Received: 27 November 2014

Accepted: 18 May 2015

Published: 27 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Nov 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 May 2015 Editorially accepted
27 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Perinatal Services BC, Vancouver, Canada
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Shaughnessy Building C420, BC Children’s and Women’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
(3)
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Advertisement