From: Quality of websites of obstetrics and gynecology departments: a cross-sectional study
Overall N = 672 | German N = 566 | Austrian N = 57 | Swiss N = 49 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total website-score (26) | 13.8 ± 3.3 | 14.0 ± 3.2 *** | 11.6 ± 2.6 | 13.8 ± 4.0 ^^ | |
Google search rank (2) | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.4 ± 0.8 *** | 0.8 ± 0.9 | 1.3 ± 0.8 ^^ | |
1 | When performing a Google search, is a link to the department (or the hosting institution) listed on the first page of results? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 528 (78.6%) | 467 (82.5%) *** | 23 (40.4%) | 38 (77.6%) ^^^ |
2 | Is there a direct link to the departments starting page within the first page of Google results? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 362 (53.9%) | 317 (56.0%) ** | 19 (33.3%) | 26 (53.1%) |
Technical aspects (10) | 4.6 ± 1.4 | 4.6 ± 1.4 | 4.7 ± 1.4 | 4.4 ± 1.4 | |
3 | Do individual sub-pages have specific and meaningful titles? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 607 (90.3%) | 510 (90.1%) | 53 (93.0%) | 44 (89.8%) |
4 | For individual sub-pages, is a specific and meaningful description provided via the META/description tag? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 212 (31.5%) | 183 (32.3%) | 14 (24.6%) | 15 (30.6%) |
5 | Are the semantic HTML tags for headings (<H1>, <H2>, …), paragraphs (<P>), and tables (<TABLE>) used appropriately? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 500 (74.4%) | 420 (74.2%) | 46 (80.7%) | 34 (69.4%) |
6 | For all content-related images, are meaningful descriptions provided in the ALT-attribute of the < IMG > tags? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 203 (30.2%) | 178 (31.4%) | 14 (24.6%) | 11 (22.4%) |
7 | Does the website provide useful/useable information even when CSS, JavaScript, and images are disabled or missing? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 546 (81.3%) | 458 (80.9%) | 48 (84.2%) | 40 (81.6%) |
8 | Does the website make use of Flash plug-in? (Y = 0, N = 1) | 642 (95.5%) | 540 (95.4%) | 55 (96.5%) | 47 (95.9%) |
9 | In case the website uses Flash, are alternatives offered for website visitors using Flash-incapable devices, or does the website at least make it obvious to visitors that they miss out on content? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 20 (3.0%) | 19 (3.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.0%) |
10 | Is the layout of the website responsive (i.e. does it adapt do varying screen sizes), or is a separate version for mobile devices available? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 59 (8.8%) | 45 (8.0%) °° | 3 (5.3%) | 11 (22.4%) ^ |
11 | Does the website offer means to adjust (increase) the text size without compromising the functionality of the website? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 245 (36.4%) | 209 (36.9%) | 25 (43.9%) | 11 (22.4%) ^ |
12 | Does the website offer means to adjust (increase) the contrast of textual information for visitors with visual impairments (Y = 1, N = 0) | 13 (1.9%) | 11 (1.9%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
13 | Does the website offer information in one or more additional languages? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 54 (8.0%) | 45 (8.0%) | 7 (12.3%) | 2 (4.1%) |
Navigation (8) | 5.2 ± 1.4 | 5.3 ± 1.4 *** | 4.5 ± 1.3 | 5.3 ± 1.4 ^^ | |
14 | Does the department’s website have a dedicated starting (welcome) page? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 643 (95.7%) | 541 (95.6%) | 54 (94.7%) | 48 (98.0%) |
15 | Does the website provide a (consistently accessible) menu structure for navigating the department’s sub-pages? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 545 (81.1%) | 470 (83.0%) *** | 33 (57.9%) | 42 (85.7%) ^^ |
16 | Does the website provide a (working) search facility? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 554 (82.4%) | 457 (80.7%) ° | 50 (87.7%) | 47 (95.9%) |
17 | Are there dedicated subsections of the website for obstetric and general gynecologic patients? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 384 (57.1%) | 338 (59.7%) *** | 14 (24.6%) | 32 (65.3%) ^^^ |
18 | Does the website contain a subsection directed specifically at referring physicians? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 69 (10.3%) | 54 (9.5%) ° | 5 (8.8%) | 10 (20.4%) |
19 | Is there a (direct navigational) link to information about the department’s staff? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 519 (77.2%) | 444 (78.4%) | 41 (71.9%) | 34 (69.4%) |
20 | Is (department-specific) contact information easily accessible? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 616 (91.7%) | 528 (93.3%) ° | 49 (86.0%) | 39 (79.6%) |
21 | Does the website provide access to information on how to reach the clinic (by car or public transportation)? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 175 (26.0%) | 158 (27.9%) | 10 (17.5%) | 7 (14.3%) |
Content (6) | 2.6 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 1.3 *** | 1.7 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 1.8 ^^ | |
22 | Does the website feature content-related visual impressions? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 532 (79.2%) | 461 (81.4%) * ° | 38 (66.7%) | 33 |
23 | Does the website contain (prominently displayed) emergency information? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 167 (24.9%) | 136 (24.0%) *** °°° | 1 (1.8%) | 30 ^^^ |
24 | Are photos of the medical team (physicians, nurses) available? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 569 (84.7%) | 500 (88.3%) *** °°° | 40 (70.2%) | 29 |
25 | Does the website provide detailed information about the offered medical service spectrum? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 200 (29.8%) | 167 (29.5%) ° | 10 (17.5%) | 23 ^^ |
26 | Does the website provide an up-to-date news/events schedule? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 90 (13.4%) | 75 (13.3%) * °° | 1 (1.8%) | 14 ^^^ |
27 | Does the website provide information on births per year? (Y = 1, N = 0) | 207 (30.8%) | 193 (34.1%) ** °° | 7 (12.3%) | 7 |