Skip to main content

Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (95% C.I.) and percentage change in odds ratios for inadequate use of prenatal care according to generation (assessed by multilevel blockwise logistic regression analyses; reference category: native Dutch women)

From: Explanatory factors for first and second-generation non-western women’s inadequate prenatal care utilisation: a prospective cohort study

 

First-generation non-western

Second-generation non-western

OR

95% CI

% change

OR

95% CI

% change

1. Unadjusted

3.26

2.13 to 5.00

 

1.96

1.08 to 3.57

 

Separate blockwise analyses:

 

2. Adjusted for demographic and pregnancy factors

2.61

1.65 to 4.13

−29%

1.94

1.04 to 3.59

−2%

3. Adjusted for socioeconomic factors

2.13

1.32 to 3.43

−50%

1.78

0.97 to 3.27

−19%

4. Adjusted for sociocultural factors

1.14

0.59 to 2.18

−94%

1.10

0.55 to 2.22

−90%

5. Adjusted for psychological factors

2.94

1.87 to 4.62

−14%

1.74

0.93 to 3.23

−23%

6. Adjusted for health behavioural factors

1.80

1.08 to 3.02

−65%

1.79

0.94 to 3.42

−18%

7. Adjusted for accessibility factors

3.31

2.16 to 5.08

2%

1.99

1.09 to 3.63

3%

Blockwise structured model:

 

8. Adjusted for demographic and pregnancy factors

2.61

1.65 to 4.13

−29%

1.94

1.04 to 3.59

−2%

9. Model 8 & socioeconomic factors

1.87

1.12 to 3.10

−62%

1.86

1.00 to 3.47

−10%

10. Model 9 & sociocultural factors

0.89

0.44 to 1.83

−105%

1.23

0.61 to 2.50

−76%

11. Model 10 & psychological factors

0.93

0.45 to 1.91

−103%

1.21

0.58 to 2.50

−78%

12. Model 11 & health behavioural factors

0.62

0.27 to 1.40

−117%

1.11

0.51 to 2.44

−89%

13. Model 12 & accessibility factors

0.64

0.28 to 1.45

−116%

1.12

0.51 to 2.47

−88%

  1. Read % changes higher than 100% as 100%.