Skip to main content

Table 4 Parameter estimates, t-statistics and confidence levels for services along continuum of care

From: Conditional cash transfer schemes in Nigeria: potential gains for maternal and child health service uptake in a national pilot programme

Models and variables

 

Coefficient

t-stat

P-value

95% confidence interval

Women attending first ANC visit (Segmented regression)

  Comparison clusters

β 0 : Intercept

124.3333***

4.42

0.000

(65.50, 183.17)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

0.4145

0.06

0.955

(−14.69, 15.52)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

48.7914

1.83

0.083

(−7.07, 104.65)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

4.8908

0.66

0.515

(−10.54, 20.32)

  CCT clusters

β 0 : Intercept

129.5687***

4.74

0.000

(71.88, 187.254)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

7.5109

1.07

0.300

(−7.30, 22.32)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

−12.0445

−0.41

0.685

(−73.71, 49.62)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

0.0031

0.00

1.000

(−16.30, 16.31)

β 2b : CCT effect on level

59.2698

1.96

0.067

(−4.52, 123.06)

β 3b : CCT effect on trend

−8.3150

−1.29

0.213

(−21.87, 5.24)

Women attending at least 4 ANC visits (Prais-Winston regression)

  Comparison clusters

β 0 : Intercept

103.5899***

6.06

0.000

(67.83, 139.35)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

−0.2366

−0.06

0.951

(−8.26, 7.79)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

4.5210

0.36

0.726

(−22.08, 31.12)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

3.2709

0.76

0.456

(−5.72, 12.26)

  CCT clusters

β 0 : Intercept

99.9540***

6.30

0.000

(66.51, 133.40)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

3.4686

0.85

0.408

(−5.17, 12.10)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

13.0980

0.77

0.454

(−22.93, 49.13)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

−5.1937

−1.17

0.259

(−14.57, 4.18)

β 2b : CCT effect on level

−45.53212*

−2.58

0.019

(−82.71, −8.36)

β 3b : CCT effect on trend

15.1152**

4.13

0.001

(7.38, 22.85)

Women receiving at least 2 doses Tetanus toxoid (Segmented regression)

  Comparison clusters

β 0 : Intercept

92.0673***

5.23

0.000

(55.26, 128.88)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

−0.6289

−0.14

0.891

(−10.08, 8.82)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

34.2304

2.05

0.054

(−0.72, 69.18)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

2.6467

0.57

0.573

(−7.00, 12.30)

  CCT clusters

β 0 : Intercept

119.5147***

4.77

0.000

(66.62, 172.41)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

−1.7751

−0.28

0.786

(−15.36, 11.81)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

45.8895

1.71

0.105

(−10.66, 102.44)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

1.7798

0.25

0.805

(−13.17, 16.73)

β 2b : CCT effect on level

−19.01

−0.69

0.502

(−77.51, 39.48)

β 3b : CCT effect on trend

21.65**

3.68

0.002

(9.23, 34.08)

Women delivering with skilled attendance (Segmented regression)

  Comparison clusters

β 0 : Intercept

62.5497***

8.32

0.000

(46.82, 78.28)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

−0.4847

−0.25

0.804

(−4.52, 3.55)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

15.0429*

2.11

0.049

(0.11, 30.00)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

2.37

1.20

0.244

(−1.76, 6.49)

  CCT clusters

β 0 : Intercept

37.8933***

6.72

0.000

(26.00, 49.80)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

0.0314

0.02

0.983

(−3.02, 3.09)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

−0.0332

−0.01

0.996

(−12.75, 12.68)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

4.8661**

3.05

0.007

(1.50, 8.23)

β 2b : CCT effect on level

−8.2210

−1.32

0.205

(−21.38, 4.93)

β 3b : CCT effect on trend

0.6618

0.50

0.624

(−2.13, 3.46)

Newborns provided with OPV at birth (Segmented regression)

    

  Comparison clusters

β 0 : Intercept

120.0659***

6.35

0.000

(80.47, 159.67)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

3.7302

0.77

0.452

(−6.44, 13.90)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

15.1527

0.84

0.409

(−22.44, 52.75)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

−2.5497

−0.51

0.613

(−12.93, 7.83)

  CCT clusters

β 0 : Intercept

155.8673***

14.71

0.000

(133.51, 178.22)

β 1 : Secular (time) trend

3.8689

1.42

0.173

(−1.87, 9.61)

β 2a : Supply effect on level

−24.2458*

−2.14

0.047

(−48.14, −0.35)

β 3a : Supply effect on trend

−0.6203

−0.21

0.838

(−6.94, 5.70)

β 2b : CCT effect on level

1.1507

0.10

0.923

(−23.57, 25.87)

β 3b : CCT effect on trend

3.0739

1.23

0.234

(−2.18, 8.33)

  1. Note: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
  2. Effects of the CCT intervention in the regression model are shown in bold text.
  3. Data source: facility logbooks in the 124 PHCs where data was collected.