From: Reducing stillbirths: prevention and management of medical disorders and infections during pregnancy
Source | Location and Type of Trial | Intervention | Stillbirths and perinatal outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Reviews & meta-analyses | Â | Â | Â |
Argentina, USA, Australia, Ecuador, India, Egypt, Peru, South Africa, Vietnam. Meta-analysis (Cochrane) 10 RCTs included, N = 15,103 women. | To assess the effects of calcium supplementation during pregnancy vs. placebo on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and related maternal and child outcomes. | SB or death before discharge from hospital: RR = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73–1.09) [NS] | |
Trumbo et al. 2007 [16] | Argentina, USA, Guatemala, Austrália. Review (FDA). 7 RCTs included, N = 6542 women. | To assess the effects of calcium supplementation during pregnancy vs. placebo on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. | PIH: 3 of 7 RCTs showed reduction in PIH with 2 g/day dose, 4 RCTs showed no impact. Pre-eclampsia: 2 of 5 RCTs showed reduction in pre-eclampsia with 1.8 or 2 g/day dose, 3 RCTs showed no impact. |
Intervention studies | |||
Kumar et al. 2009 [19] | India (New Delhi). Lok Nayak Hospital. RCT. N = 524 healthy primigravidas with a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg between the 12th and 25th weeks of gestation. | Compared the impact of 2 g of elemental calcium (intervention) vs. placebo (controls) from the time of enrollment to delivery. | SBR: 5/251 (2.0%) vs. 6/273 (2.2%) in intervention and control groups, respectively; P = 0.62. |