Skip to main content

Table 1 Classification systems and their characteristics for use in low- and middle-income countries

From: Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - Issues in data collection for stillbirths

Systems tested in low- or middle-income countries

Number of categories of stillbirthsa

Are intrapartum events captured in subcategories?

Does the system aim to capture underlying cause?

Are the main categories consistent with underlying cause?

Resources desirable for useb

Does the system separate unknown from unexplained?

Agreement tested (Kappa score or level of agreement)

References

Aberdeen

8-0-0

no

yes

no

B

no

0.35-0.97

[49, 84, 93–95]

CODAC

10-94-577

yes

yes

yes

B, C

yes

0.65-0.94

[49, 50]

CODAC Simplified

10-30

yes

yes

yes

B, C

yes

no

[50]

ICD-10

17-134

yes

yes

yes/no

B

no

no

[23]

Nordic Baltic

13-0-0

no

no

no

A

no

0.85

[84]

Pattinsonc

12-48-0

yes

no

no

B

no

no

[96, 97]

PSANZ-PDC

11-52-33

yes/no

yes

yes/no

B, C

yes

0.63-0.90

[49, 86]

ReCoDe

9-28-1

yes/no

no

no

B, C

yes

0.51

[49, 98]

Tulip

6-24-7

no/yes

yes

yes

B, C

yes

0.74-0.86

[49, 87]

Whitfieldc

12-15-2

no

yes

no

B

no

no

[95, 99]

Wigglesworth

5-0-0

no

no

no

A

no

0.25-0.85

[49, 84]

  1. aNumber of main categories followed by subcategories.
  2. bA = little investigations and no placental examinations necessary; B = some clinical and pathological investigations necessary or desirable; C = placental investigations necessary or desirable (placental conditions included in the classification).
  3. cModified versions of the Aberdeen classification.
  4. Acronyms: CODAC: Causes of Death and Associated Conditions, PSANZ-PDC: Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification, ReCoDe: Relevant Conditions of Death.