Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Relative bioavailability of iron and folic acid from a new powdered supplement compared to a traditional tablet in pregnant women

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Della Forster
6 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Fairweather-Tait
13 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shashi Chiplonkar
5 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Fairweather-Tait
9 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Della Forster
11 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shashi Chiplonkar
2 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-9-33

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement