Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An evaluation of classification systems for stillbirth

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Robson
26 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Russell Kirby
3 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Jaap H.M. Erwich
15 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Jaap H.M. Erwich
14 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Russell Kirby
18 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 4
18 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
5 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 8
5 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
11 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 11
11 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
19 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
19 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-9-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement