Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of experiences and awareness of danger signs between pregnant women attending rural and urban antenatal clinics.

From: Antenatal care in The Gambia: Missed opportunity for information, education and communication

Characteristic

Rural pregnant women n/N (%)

Urban pregnant women n/N (%)

Relative Risk Ratio Rural/Urban (95% confidence interval)

p value

Adequate privacy

146/202 (72.3)

141/248 (56.9)

1.3 (1.1 – 1.5)

0.001

Awareness of danger signs

    

Anaemia/pallor/fatigue/breathlessness/dizziness

69/187 (36.9)

52/231 (22.5)

1.6 (1.2 – 2.2)

0.002

Hypertension/headache/swelling/fits

58/187 (31)

45/231 (19.5)

1.6 (1.1 – 2.2)

0.009

Antenatal client...

    

Said she spent 3 minutes or less with provider

136/192 (70.8)

173/246 (70.3)

1.0 (0.9–1.1)

0.84

Was told progress of pregnancy

51/202 (25.2)

64/250 (25.6)

1.0 (0.7–1.4)

0.98

Asked the antenatal care provider questions

32/202 (15.8)

26/250 (10.4)

1.5 (0.9–2.5)

0.11

Understood answers given by provider

28/33 (84.8)

27/32 (84.4)

1.0 (0.8–1.2)

0.77

Was asked to return for another visit

140/200 (70.0)

172/249 (69.1)

1.0 (0.9–1.2)

0.91

Had complications in previous pregnancy and was advised to deliver at a health facility in current pregnancy

7/25 (28.0)

6/20 (30.0)

0.9 (0.4–2.3)

0.85

Awareness of danger signs

    

Haemorrhage/heavy bleeding

24/187 (12.8)

38/231 (16.5)

0.8 (0.5–1.3)

0.37

Sepsis/foul smelling discharge/postpartum abdominal pain

5/187 (2.7)

16/231 (6.9)

0.4 (0.1–1.0)

0.08

Cessation of fetal movement/baby does not move

6/187 (3.2)

7/231 (3.0)

1.1 (0.4–3.1)

0.86

Light bleeding/spotting

2/187 (1.1)

7/231 (3.0)

0.4 (0.1–1.7)

0.3