Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratios and predicted prevalences (in selected subgroups) of excessive gestational weight gain calculated from multivariable logistic regression model*

From: Misperceived pre-pregnancy body weight status predicts excessive gestational weight gain: findings from a US cohort study

 

Pre-pregnancy weight status perception

 

Normal weight women

Overweight/obese women

 

Accurate assessors n = 898

Overassessors n = 131

Accurate assessors n = 438

Underassessors n = 70

Multivariable odds ratios (95% CI)

1.0 (Referent)

2.0 (1.3, 3.0)

2.9 (2.2, 3.9)

7.6 (3.4, 17.0)

Participant characteristics modeled†

Predicted prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain (prevalence ratio) ‡

   Aged 23 y, non-white, parous, lower income, less education§

37%

54% (1.5)

64% (1.7)

82% (2.2)

   Aged 23 y, white, parous, lower income, less education§

45%

62% (1.4)

70% (1.6)

86% (1.9)

   Aged 32 y, white, nulliparous, higher income, well-educated ||

49%

66% (1.3)

74% (1.5)

88% (1.8)

  1. * Data from 1537 mothers participating in Project Viva.
  2. † All groups were married, employed, non-smokers, and had mean pre-pregnancy BMI and gestation length.
  3. ‡ Prevalence ratios compare predicted prevalence in each category with normal weight accurate assessors who had the same participant characteristics.
  4. §Household income less than or equal to $40,000 per year, some college or less.
  5. || Household income more than $40,000 per year, college degree.