Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameters of intercept (I) and slope (β) for predicting the birth weights of second-born children based on gestational age and sex * of first- and second-born children.

From: Assessing fetal growth impairments based on family data as a tool for identifying high-risk babies. An example with neonatal mortality

Gestational age of second child (g1: weeks)

Gestational age of first child (g2: weeks)

 
 

28–33

34–35

36–37

38–39

40–41

>= 42

SD

 

No.

I

β

No.

I

β

No.

I

β

No.

I

β

No.

I

β

No.

I

β

 

28–29

62

900

0.198

46

615

0.283

55

850

0.150

164

1030

0.066

190

735

0.148

37

840

0.111

240

30–31

117

980

0.348

65

740

0.385

114

1110

0.177

256

1050

0.168

309

880

0.207

42

195

0.359

320

32–33

167

1430

0.360

149

1270

0.312

293

920

0.407

557

1470

0.171

613

1230

0.224

78

1220

0.231

360

34

144

1650

0.407

196

1395

0.450

281

1075

0.462

563

1150

0.382

591

1140

0.352

83

1265

0.304

440

35

200

1675

0.496

261

1285

0.575

529

865

0.632

925

1095

0.481

941

1230

0.397

124

1255

0.379

440

36

301

2005

0.439

426

1140

0.722

1107

1110

0.649

2026

1335

0.490

1975

1365

0.439

244

1500

0.378

435

37

495

2450

0.341

712

1705

0.566

2420

1465

0.588

5388

1380

0.553

5147

1270

0.539

619

1385

0.485

435

38

659

2660

0.296

1132

2095

0.488

4263

1735

0.546

16229

1650

0.526

17312

1560

0.521

2329

1685

0.468

400

39

806

3050

0.212

1385

2355

0.448

5872

2030

0.501

31014

1750

0.541

43119

1690

0.534

5487

1790

0.490

385

40–41

1204

3295

0.171

1863

2785

0.344

8110

2345

0.446

51057

1855

0.553

132010

1780

0.554

25393

1905

0.510

390

>= 42

145

3520

0.125

182

3385

0.184

695

2670

0.382

4692

2220

0.488

19508

1855

0.568

8479

1960

0.531

415

  1. No: Number of sibships included.
  2. SD: Estimated Standard Deviation based on the regression model.
  3. * The estimated sex correction (γ(s 1, s 2)) is:
  4. -- 1.st female – 2.nd female: -65 grams
  5. -- 1.st female – 2.nd male: +85 grams,
  6. -- 1.st male – 2.nd female: -145 grams,
  7. -- 1.st male – 2.nd male: 0 grams (reference).
  8. Example
  9. According to the model used, for a baby boy at 39 weeks of gestation with an older brother who weighed 2000 grams at 34–35 week of gestation, had a predicted birth weight of 3251 grams (Table 2, I(g 1 = 34–35, g 2 = 39) = 2355, β(g 1 = 34–35, g 2 = 39) = 0.448, γ(s 1 = male, s 2 = male) = 0, i.e., predicted birth weight = 2355 + 0.448 * 2000 grams + 0). Similarly, if the second-born was a girl, she would have a predicted birth weight of 3106 grams (Table 2, I(g 1 = 34–35, g 2 = 39) = 2355, β(g 1 = 34–35, g 2 = 39) = 0.448, γ(s 1 = male, s 2 = female) = -145 grams, i.e., predicted birth weight = 2355 + 0.448 * 2000 grams – 145 grams).