Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effects of high volume saline enemas vs no enema during labour – The N-Ma Randomised Controlled Trial [ISRCTN43153145]

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jun 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justus Hofmeyr
22 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justus Hofmeyr
15 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai
2 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai
6 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
19 Mar 2006 Editorially accepted
19 Mar 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-6-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement