Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomized cross over trial of tolerability and compliance of a micronutrient supplement with low iron separated from calcium vs high iron combined with calcium in pregnant women [ISRCTN56071145]

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Oct 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Nov 2005 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Nov 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew E. Czeizel
16 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anwar T. Merchant
30 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anwar T. Merchant
2 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew E. Czeizel
17 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
27 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 8
27 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 8
31 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 9
31 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
4 Apr 2006 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-6-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement