Multicenter prospective clinical study to evaluate the prediction of short-term outcome in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia (PROGNOSIS): study protocol
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Feb 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cem Dane|
|30 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lucy Chappell|
|8 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Demetrios Rizos|
|11 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tiffany Moore Simas|
|13 Aug 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Hund|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Aug 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tiffany Moore Simas|
|28 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lucy Chappell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Sep 2014||Editorially accepted|
|18 Sep 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-14-324|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.