Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk factors for non-use of iron/folic acid (IFA) supplements during pregnancy in women with the most recent live births within 5 years prior to the surveyed in 14 surveyed districts in Pakistan, findings of univariate and multivariate logistic regression

From: Factors associated with non-use of antenatal iron and folic acid supplements among Pakistani women: a cross sectional household survey

Variable

Women who did not use iron supplements

Unadjusted

Adjusted

n

%

OR1

95% CI2

p

OR1

95% CI2

p

District

          

Jhelum

102

42.5

1.00

   

1.00

   

Charsadda

165

49.8

1.34

0.9

1.99

0.143

0.38

0.23

0.62

<0.0001

Sukkur

188

53.9

1.58

1.02

2.43

0.038

0.77

0.48

1.21

0.252

Swabi

171

54.7

1.63

1.02

2.62

0.043

0.58

0.35

0.95

0.029

Sanghar

292

55.9

1.71

1.18

2.49

0.005

0.47

0.3

0.74

0.001

Thatta

214

56.1

1.72

1.16

2.56

0.007

0.58

0.38

0.91

0.016

Mansehra

226

59.5

1.98

1.31

3.01

0.001

1.19

0.78

1.81

0.431

Mardan

292

59.5

1.98

1.31

2.99

0.001

0.8

0.51

1.25

0.328

Larkana

382

61.8

2.18

1.48

3.22

0.0001

0.94

0.6

1.47

0.792

Dadu

360

62.9

2.29

1.52

3.45

0.0001

0.94

0.61

1.46

0.792

Ghotki

246

66.5

2.68

1.86

3.88

0.0001

1.09

0.71

1.67

0.704

Bahawalpur

457

68.4

2.92

1.92

4.43

0.0001

1.49

0.96

2.34

0.078

Rajanpur

332

72.5

3.55

2.39

5.28

0.0001

1.09

0.7

1.69

0.699

Dera Ghazi Khan

440

76.9

4.51

2.89

7.03

0.0001

1.72

1.05

2.82

0.032

Place of residence

          

Urban

595

50.5

1.00

       

Rural

3,272

64.3

1.77

1.48

2.10

0.0001

NS

   

Lady health worker program area

          

Yes

2,670

58.8

1.00

       

No

1,197

69.3

1.58

1.34

1.85

0.0001

NS

   

Age of respondents

          

15 to 24 years

849

58.1

1.00

   

1.00

   

25 to 34 years

1,996

60.6

1.10

0.95

1.27

0.200

1.07

0.90

1.28

0.409

35 to 44 years

923

66.3

1.37

1.14

1.14

0.001

1.12

0.91

1.39

0.290

45 years and more

98

81.4

3.11

1.84

184

<0.0001

1.97

1.07

3.62

0.029

Educational status of respondents

          

Above secondary

101

28.6

1.00

   

1.00

   

At least some secondary school

324

40.6

1.71

1.25

2.33

0.001

1.27

0.89

1.82

0.197

At least some primary school

486

53.4

2.86

2.08

3.92

0.0001

1.70

1.16

2.49

0.006

No education

2,956

70.3

5.91

4.48

7.79

0.0001

2.36

1.65

3.37

<0.0001

Working status of respondents

          

Not working

2,516

58.2

1.00

       

Working

1,345

69.7

1.65

1.43

1.91

0.0001

NS

   

Educational status of respondents’ husband

          

Above secondary

454

41.3

1.00

   

1.00

   

At least some secondary school

1,050

57.2

1.90

1.61

2.25

0.0001

1.32

1.06

1.64

0.014

At least some primary school

647

65.4

2.69

2.23

3.24

0.0001

1.34

1.04

1.72

0.023

No education

1,684

73.5

3.93

3.32

4.66

0.0001

1.58

1.27

1.97

<0.0001

Household wealth index

          

Highest

542

43.8

1.00

   

1.00

   

Medium high

865

54.2

1.52

1.25

1.84

0.0001

1.02

0.81

1.27

0.890

Medium low

1,172

68.6

2.81

2.33

3.39

0.0001

1.34

1.05

1.71

0.017

Lowest

1,287

74.7

3.80

3.14

4.60

0.0001

1.47

1.11

1.93

0.006

Outcome of last live birth within 5 years preceding the survey

          

Singleton

3,814

61.7

1.00

       

Twins

52

60.4

0.94

0.56

1.59

0.831

NS

   

Duration since last birth within 5 years preceding the survey

          

Within 1 year

1,176

58.4

1.00

       

1 to 2 years

1,833

62.1

1.17

1.01

1.35

0.035

NS

   

3 and more years

858

66.0

1.38

1.16

1.66

<0.0001

    

Number of live births within 5 years preceding the survey

          

One

1,702

62.0

1.00

       

Two

1,570

60.9

0.95

0.83

1.09

0.505

NS

   

Three and more

595

63.1

1.05

0.87

1.27

0.622

    

Antenatal services by type of providers

          

Health professionals

1,739

44.2

1.00

   

1.00

   

Untrained providers

62

56.7

1.65

1.05

2.59

0.029

1.44

0.91

2.27

0.130

No services

1,942

92.7

16.07

12.99

19.88

<0.0001

13.39

10.70

16.75

<0.0001

  1. 147 missing values were excluded from the analysis.
  2. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were obtained using logistic regression analysis.
  3. 1OR: Odds Ratio.
  4. 2CI: Confidence Interval.