| Study | Study data | Effect | 95% confidence interval, s.e. or p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conditional cash transfers | ||||
 | Hernandez Prado et al. [27] | 2003 | No effect in early intervention rural areas | p > 0.1 |
20.1% increase in late intervention rural areas | p < 0.05 | |||
10.9-11.3% relative decrease in urban areas | p < 0.05 | |||
 | Urquieta et al. [32] | 1998, 2000 | No effect | p > 0.1 |
 | Sosa-Rubai et al. [31] | 2007 | OR: 2.4 in early intervention areas | s.e.: 0.9 |
OR: 3.3 in late intervention areas | s.e.: 1.4 | |||
 | De Brauw and Peterman [33] | 2008 | 12.3-17.8 percentage point increase | s.e.: 5.4-9.9 |
Payments to offset costs of access | ||||
 | Powell-Jackson et al. [61] | 2001-2007 | 2.3 percentage point increase from baseline | p < 0.01 |
 | Powell-Jackson and Hanson [10] | 2008 | 16.6% increase compared to controls | CI: 4.1, 29.1 |
 | Lim et al. [9] | 2002-2004, 2007-2009 | 36.2-39.3 increased probability among recipients | CI: 33.7, 45.0 |
 | Santhya et al. [45] | 2009, 2010 | Mean difference: 100% higher among recipients | p < 0.001 |
Mean difference: 78.2% rise among recipients with past births and no increase among non-recipients | p < 0.001 | |||
 | Powell-Jackson et al. [35] | 2002-2004, 2007-2009 | 8.1 percentage point increase from baseline | s.e.: 1.8 |
Vouchers for maternity services | ||||
 | Rob et al. [75] | 2007, 2008 | 16.1 percentage point increase from baseline | p < 0.01 |
 | Ahmed and Khan [79] | 2008 | OR: 3.6 among recipients | s.e.: 0.1 |
 | Hatt et al. [8] | 2009 | 46.2 percentage points higher in intervention areas | p < 0.001 |
 | Nguyen et al. [80] | 2009 | 46.4% more likely in intervention areas | s.e.: 4.3 |
 | Obare et al. [65] | 2010 | OR: 2.0 in early intervention areas | CI: 1.4, 2.8 |
OR: 0.9 in late intervention areas | CI: 0.6, 1.5 | |||
 | Bellows et al. [64] | 2006, 2009 | OR: 1.2 in intervention areas | CI: 1.0, 1.4 |
OR: 12.9 among recipients | CI: 8.9, 19.3 |