Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Using a decline in serum hCG between days 0–4 to predict ectopic pregnancy treatment success after single-dose methotrexate: a retrospective cohort study

  • Monika Skubisz1, 2Email author,
  • Philip Dutton3,
  • William Colin Duncan3,
  • Andrew W Horne3 and
  • Stephen Tong1
Contributed equally
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201313:30

Received: 18 October 2012

Accepted: 29 January 2013

Published: 1 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Lipscomb
4 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - volkan turan
14 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Monika Skubisz
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Lipscomb
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-13-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Translational Obstetrics Group, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Australia
The Ritchie Centre, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK